| Abstract: |
The publication challenges the epistemological function of the Reader as a stabilizing device. It does not claim to offer a definitive version of South-east Asia’s modernity, but instead opens space for debate, contradiction, and incompleteness. This is especially significant in the context of global art history, where the notion of modernism has been primarily defined by Western genealogies and institutional frame-works. By assembling a translocal archive that is purposefully heterogeneous, The Modern in Southeast Asian Art positions itself not as a self-contained reference work, but as an invitation to further research, reinterpretation, and methodological pluralism.
|
